IPv4 to IPv6 Transition - There is a great methodology?
@2015
Security challenges in transition from IPv4 to IPv6
@2016
SOA –MAIN REASONS AND BENEFITS OF ADOPTION OF SOA ARCHITECTURE
@2018
A Prototype Proposal for Mobile Pervasive
Augmented Reality Systems: Improving the Quality of Experience in Outdoor Sports Environments
@2021
Cybersecurity in Smart Cities:
Technology and Data Security
in Intelligent Transport Systems
@2021
BYOD - Impact in Architecture and Information Security Corporate Policy
@2022
Using Smart Data for Mobile Pervasive Augmented Reality Systems in Outdoor Sporting Environments
@2022
Cloud Computing – Quem garante a segurança dos dados?
@2022
Estudo da eficiência da comunicação IPv4 versus IPv6 na
rede de investigação e ensino Portuguesa RCTS entre
Lisboa e Covilhã
@2016
With the entry into a paradigm of distribution scarcity of IPv4 addresses the
transition to IPv6 is the only solution for the continued growth of the Internet. However IPv4 is
not compatible with IPv6 but, still there are many IPv4 networks that use that protocol so, it is
necessary to use transition methods for both protocols to work simultaneously until a real
possibility of making a full transition to IPv6 protocol. The transition will have to be done in
this way, so that each application requiring network resources can communicate with both
IPv4 and IPv6 networks.
It is important to realize that this change will not happen overnight and it will be a
process that will take some time and it will be necessary to evaluate several metrics before
full transition, such as performance.
This thesis aims to evaluate the performance using the metrics for the evaluation of
quality of service (QoS) of IPv4 and IPv6 protocols within the Portuguese Research and
Education Network (RCTS) through traffic injection on the network using the software of
generation and measurement of traffic D-ITG. For this there were two experimental tests,
where the traffic injection occurred at two different times (during working hours and after
work hours) and simulated four scenarios simultaneously: transfer of UDP and TCP packets,
VoIP and streaming audio and video. The evaluation parameters chosen were the amount of
transferred packets, delay, jitter and packet loss.
Some advantages of the IPv6 protocol in relation to IPv4 are also mentioned
